National Guard, Food Bank and the shutdown
Digest more
National Guard, deploy troops and Supreme Court
Digest more
As some judges challenge the Trump administration's representation of conditions on the ground, the legal and political stakes of the debate are multiplying.
Experts say immigration agents have more latitude to be destructive than National Guard—with fewer avenues for San Francisco to push back.
The full 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declined to rehear a panel’s order allowing National Guard troops to deploy
4don MSN
Trump’s National Guard deployments reignite 200-year-old legal debate over state vs. federal power
The Supreme Court initially resisted the expansion of federal power, striking down laws banning child labor in Hammer v. Dagenhart in 1918, setting a federal minimum wage in 1923 in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, and offering farmers subsidies in U.S. v. Butler in 1937. All these decisions were based on the 10th Amendment.
The new bill in New York would allow the state attorney general to sue for a court order blocking a guard deployment if another state attempted to send troops without authorization. That wouldn’t include cases where the guard has been formally federalized, according to News 10.
18don MSN
Illinois and Chicago sue to block Trump deployment of National Guard, but troops already on the way
Illinois and Chicago have sued the Trump administration to block deployment of the National Guard to Chicago, though it was revealed in court that troops are already on the way.
A D.C. man filed a lawsuit stating that 'The Imperial March' is used in his peaceful protests against U.S. President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard members.