Writing for the 6-3 majority, Justice Elena Kagan said that the technique, known as geofencing, violates the Fourth Amendment ...

Updated on June 29 at 3:50 p.m. The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that when law enforcement officials used a “geofence ...

Law enforcement’s use of warrants sweeping smartphone location data requires privacy protections, court rules ...

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON, June 29 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out a judicial decision involving a ...

Kagan said location data is like private materials such as emails and documents.

The Fourth Amendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday. The same logic already applied to ...

Google will soon allow users to store their location data on their devices rather than on Google's servers, effectively ending a long-running surveillance practice that allowed police and law ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 29 (local time) that “individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding ...

A federal appeals court has ruled that geofence warrants are unconstitutional, a decision that will limit the use of the controversial search warrants across several U.S. states. The Friday ruling ...

The high court held that a user's location data shared with a tech company like Google is protected by the Fourth Amendment.

Jan. 16 (UPI) --The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to review a challenge to geofence warrants filed by a man who was convicted of robbing a bank in 2019. Okello Chatrie was convicted of robbing ...

The US Supreme Court has surprisingly decided to restrict geofence warrants.