The internet's "enshittification," as veteran journalist and privacy advocate Cory Doctorow describes it, began decades before TikTok made the scene. Elder millennials remember the good old days of ...
Artificial intelligence companies don't need permission from authors to train their large language models (LLMs) on legally acquired books, US District Judge William Alsup ruled Monday. The ...
A judge’s decision that Anthropic‘s use of copyrighted books to train its AI models is a “fair use” is likely only the start of lengthy litigation to resolve one of the most hotly contested questions ...
Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Anthropic’s use of copyrighted material for training was fair use. His decision carries weight.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court’s copyright infringement decision, finding that a congressional reelection campaign’s use of a popular meme to solicit ...
America’s frontier artificial intelligence (AI) labs have faced years of copyright litigation over their ingestion of books, news, and other expressive works. Yet, until this week, no US court had ...
This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use. Katelyn is a writer with CNET covering artificial intelligence, including chatbots, image and video ...
Anthropic faced potential liabilities in the billions due to piracy ruling OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta battling similar lawsuits Fair use defense remains contentious in AI copyright cases Amazon (AMZN.O), ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback